"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> urbanMamas

Etiquette on Multi-Use Paths

Now that summer is out and outdoor recreating is in (not that it was ever "out"), we find multi-use paths packed with walkers, runners, bikers, starting-to-bikers, toddlers, roller-bladers, skateboarders, dogs, squirrels, birds, and many other users.  There are clusters of middle- and high-schoolers, there are amblers with headphones on, there are darting animals, children.  Bodies travel at different paces - fast, slow, medium, stopped.  On a warm weekend day, the multi-use path can be an obstacle course.

Even the widest of paths aren't as wide as a car lane (11-12 feet across).  More typically, the path might be 7 or 8 feet across, just enough for two way cross traffic in single file.  Collisions and brushes with others can be frequent if you are walking/riding/skuuting 2+ abreast.  Weaving in and out of bodies takes skill, whether on foot or wheels.

How do we encourage the kids to "share the path" responsibly, reasonable?  My tips include:

  • walk/ride to the right, always.
  • 2+ abreast is ok, so long as there is no oncoming traffic
  • "single file!" is what I utter loudly when we spot oncoming traffic, and my kids immediately pull ahead of me and I drop to the rear position, and we will go in single file to allow enough width for passing
  • use the bell!  whether on a scooter, bike, jogger: we ring, ring from a distance behind and call "on your left" as we pass
  • ride straight, as much as possible, unless you are on a super-wide path.  
  • for the learning pedalers, learning scooters: walk/ride behind, to be able to call out and ask the little ones ahead to stop, pull to the side, or ride as straight as possible.
  • be defensive.  as with driving, we have to anticipate the unexpected: a dog on a long leash speeding ahead crosswise along the path, leash obstructing; a toddler darting out from one side of the path to the other, maybe chasing a leaf, squirrel, bird; an early bike-rider swerving considerably as you try to overtake/pass.

With a few close calls in just the past couple of days, I thought I'd collect your thoughts on how we can manage the multi-use paths safely, responsibly, and teach our kids to do the same?

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

All of what you mentioned makes sense. When I am on the bike and passing runners and walkers, I tried to leave a lot of space between them and me. I am sensitive to this ever since my friend pointed out that I was cutting it close when passing a walker. I had no idea I was doing that, but I can imagine it doesn't feel safe for the one being passed.

All good tips, with one small quibble. I would disagree with the riding 2+ abreast as long as there isn't on-coming traffic. What about people riding up behind you and trying to pass? 2 abreast is okay with me as long as there is still sufficient passing room, but I wouldn't go beyond that.

As a part-time still somewhat newbie bike commuter (started in December) I have been trying to avoid multi use paths (basically Waterfront Park) as much as possible. Pedestrians walk 2, 3, 4 abreast and don't look for anyone else (in fairness, I also don't look behind me when I walk). Between that and small animals on long leashes and people just stopped to gather and talk (just a hint of sarcasm thrown in...) it makes it too much of an obstacle course for my taste.

I just have to say that one of my huge pet peeves is the hard core getting-my-workout speed bikers who don't recognize that a family-geared multi-use path on a sunny summer Sunday is not their venue. Maybe this is only an issue where I live (the Gorge) vs. Portland. But it's been enough of a turnoff to me on the occasions where I've gathered my kids and mom friends with kids for a lovely walk/bike that I have stopped doing it entirely, which is a real shame. I had enough of the glares. Yes, kids need to learn rules. But my kid is two, give her a break. Makes me long for a life in a place where hardcore recreation is not the obsession and kids can be kids.

Man Jag älskar din artikel och det var så bra och jag ska spara det. En sak att säga fördjupad analys som du har gjort är mycket remarkable.No man går det där lilla extra i dessa dagar? Bra gjort. Bara en förslag som du canget ett Översättare Ansökan för din globala publik.

I feel like MUPs in Portland are a great demonstration of the way our transportation resources are allocated - cars get 95% of the space and money, and bicyclists and pedestrians jockey for the remainder. I think everybody on MUPs could be more considerate of our fellow trail-users, and all of us should be working together to demand that policymakers help us get a little more space.

I wish there were a fun, carefree place for kids to ride their bikes around, but MUPs aren't the place, particularly not the Esplanade or Springwater Corridor in Portland. I spend most of our rides alternating between telling my 12 year-old to ride in a straight line and pay attention to other people ("But I didn't see him/her/it!"), and wishing that it weren't such an intense environment.

I am avoiding the multi use paths with my kids till they are way older. It just seems like a headache to try to navigate young riders in that environment while also maintain a level of safety.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment